I don’t remember a time, any more, when I didn’t have a list of restaurants I really wanted to visit. Or, to be more accurate, multiple lists. And, if anything, the whole list thing is getting worse.
For instance, I have a London list. Two, actually, both on my phone. One of places in London I’ve always wanted to visit, like Quality Chop House or Chez Bruce, the proper bucket list. The second, more geared to what people reading a Reading restaurant blog might enjoy, is of places near Paddington where you could eat after a day in London while you wait for an off peak train. That list spans from Queen’s Park to the Edgware Road – although the Elizabeth Line might render it redundant, now you can easily reach so many places from Paddington.
Another list, a recent addition, covers restaurants in Oxford. And last but not least, which is where this week’s review comes in, I have a Bristol list. It remains a mystery to me that Bristol, home to England’s most interesting food scene, lacks the food coverage you might expect. There used to be a Reach journalist, whose reviews were much like all Reach restaurant reviews except about somewhere interesting: he left to go to another local website whose output is remarkably similar. There’s also a magazine which publishes restaurant reviews, pretty irregularly: think roughly once a month.
Beyond that? It’s somewhat tumbleweed central. Bristol used to have a fair few restaurant bloggers, but many seem to have quit or drifted into #ADs and #invites. Put it this way: since the start of last year I’ve reviewed six restaurants in the city, which makes me one of Bristol’s most prolific restaurant bloggers, and I don’t even live there. However you feel about my blog – and if you’re reading this I’m guessing either way you’re not a neutral – at least Reading has a regular restaurant blog. Many cities, often far bigger, can’t say the same.
This week’s review arose from a long-overdue return to Bristol, a flying visit at short notice which sent me scurrying to my list to find somewhere suitable. Little Hollows Pasta has been on that list for quite some time, and felt like the perfect choice. It’s in Redlands, just down the road from the lovely Wilsons and Good Chemistry’s The Good Measure, perhaps my favourite Bristol pub. It’s also a short walk from Whiteladies Road and Cotham Hill, one of the city’s nicest hubs of places to eat, drink and shop.
As the name suggests, it’s a pasta restaurant – a specialist like London’s Bancone or Padella – which started out in street food and supplying restaurants before opening its site a couple of years ago. This trend is edging closer to Reading – Maidenhead’s Sauce And Flour is probably the nearest comparable restaurant – but going through the front door, spying sheets of pasta hanging in the window, the attractive dining room reminded me just how badly Sauce & Flour had bungled the job of creating a convivial space.
By contrast, Little Hollows had this sorted – plain walls, simple, tasteful furniture and minimal decor, plenty of natural light. That said, the best tables were all for larger groups: those for customers dining in pairs, in a narrow strip right up against one wall, felt like the short straw. It’s a limitation of the space, I suppose, but we were probably at the worst table in the place; by the time we got there, the place was almost completely full.

The staff, friendly and on it from the get go, talked us through the menu. All the mains are pasta dishes and the small plates, we were told, were designed to be shared. We ordered a couple of negronis – one classic, one sbagliato – and some olives, and plea bargained the other dishes. I got my second choice of pasta, but was lucky to get my first choice of starter. We ordered three of those, prepared to be convinced that they were sharable but not entirely sure they would be.
The first fumble came when the olives we’d ordered to come with our aperitifs never materialised. We eventually flagged someone down, and they’d been forgotten, but they ended up coming at the same time as the small plates. They were good – glossy plump green specimens that slipped easily off the stone, marinated with a touch of lemon. We only ordered them because Zoë is on a new health kick where she has to consume thirty different vegetables a week: I’ve suggested she could get a lot of the way there by watching the Big Brother reboot, but apparently this isn’t a helpful contribution.
The small plate we opted to share, though, was excellent. Red mullet, filleted and simply cooked with a crispy skin and a warming sunset of piquillo pepper vinaigrette, this was a gorgeous little start to the meal, and the charred lemon was a nice touch. There were still a few bones in the mullet, but otherwise it was difficult to fault, a joyous thing. Would I rather have had it to myself? Probably. Do I wish we’d ordered some bread to mop up? Again, probably.

Although it was October when we visited, the weather was in the low twenties and the other two small plates had a feeling of warmer climes about them. Zoë had chosen burrata with peach and basil, the whole thing Ronsealed with a whack of balsamic dressing. The last time I tried a dish like this was in a market in Bordeaux, at the height of summer. This, I think, was better: the peaches just magnificent, the interplay of sweetness, sharpness and mollifying creaminess bang on. Burrata has reached the point now where newspapers have started sneering about it, which I’m sure makes them look dead clever, but done well it’s still a beauty. Again, I’m not sure I’d have wanted to try sharing this, but I was lucky to get a forkful.

My small plate was another variation on the whole salad with cheese motif. Ribbons of courgette, marinated apparently, undulated above a smudge of fresh whipped ricotta, spun with lemon. That would have been nice enough, but some leaves and a hard cheese – pecorino at a guess – had been plonked on top. I suppose when a dish isn’t a looker, as this wasn’t, it’s easier to share because you don’t mind messing it up. I really liked the flavours in this but on balance I’d rather have had the burrata and peaches – which, incidentally, is the name of the ridiculous pub I plan to open in the university area if I ever win the lottery.

By this point the negronis were done and dusted, the room was bustling and I could just about make out dishes arriving at other tables, wondering whether people had ordered better than me. I was on to a very enjoyable glass of a French white made from Gros Manseng, not a grape I know, although to get all Andy Hayler for a second £9 for a glass when a bottle will cost you £11 online is quite the markup. I was already getting the picture: that Little Hollows was a wonderful spot, a neighbourhood restaurant that caused its fair share of neighbourhood envy. But I also knew that to judge the place without trying the pasta would have been an act of gastronomic coitus interruptus.
The dish that had jumped out of the menu for me, naturally, was the one Zoë chose. Mafalde are pasta ribbons with wavy, crinkly edges – “like an octopus tentacle” was Zoë’s description – and Little Hollows served them with a ragu of pork and fennel sausage, parmesan and pangrattato. This was right up my alley, and a mouthful just confirmed how good it was – the fennel seeds lent an aromatic crunch, as did the breadcrumbs, and the sausage and parmesan gave it an intense saltiness.
I would have ordered this and eaten it all the live long day, but I don’t think Zoë was as taken as I was. She prefers to have pasta as a starter or an intermediate course rather than as the main attraction, doesn’t like putting all her golden-yolked eggs in that starchy basket. With a restaurant like Little Hollows, that’s kind of by design, and I didn’t think the portion was that hefty, but even so I enjoyed it more than she did.

It didn’t help that my main course, on paper one of my favourite things, just didn’t work. Puttanesca is one of my favourite sauces: that intoxicating blend of sweet tomato, salty anchovies and olives and punchy little capers, when it comes together, is almost unimprovable. I don’t care that it could be made from a store cupboard, because it’s usually made in restaurants by someone with access to a better store cupboard than you.
So what went wrong? Well, a few things. The sauce was made with thick-gauged Datterini tomatoes, which meant that it never really cohered as a sauce. Nor did it really adhere to the pasta; I didn’t mind this being made with bucatini rather than spaghetti, but the bucatini was more al dente than I’d have chosen – about as flexible as me during a trip to the physio – and that didn’t help the dish coalesce either, lacking the option of twirling and trapping the good stuff in every forkful.
So in practice you ended up eating a lot of relatively plain pasta and then attacking the salty remnants at the bottom of the bowl. And they were nice enough, I suppose, but this dish is all about being more than the sum of its parts, and it wasn’t in this case. One to chalk up under missed opportunities: I ate it, not liking it as much as I could, while watching my other half eat a dish she also didn’t like as much as she could. And yet she still wouldn’t swap: rude.

Hey ho. We both had a glass of primitivo on the go by this point. A really good one – you couldn’t fault the wine list, and it was good to see the vast majority of it available by the glass – so we used that to put the brakes on and make a decision about dessert. When tiramisu is on the menu inevitably either Zoë goes for it or I will, but Little Hollows complicates things by offering you a standard and enhanced version, the latter laced with Frangelico and praline, a hazelnut flanker.
So Zoë ordered that and I went for the vegan chocolate mousse, and we had a couple of outstanding dessert wines into the bargain – a moscati d’Asti for her and a really cracking passito-style number from Crete for me. Would desserts cement our impression of the meal?
They sort of did but again, it was problematic. Zoë’s tiramisu looked the part but she had a spoonful and said “I think they’re brought us the standard one. Can you taste any hazelnut in this?”. So I tasted it and no, I couldn’t. I’m not a massive fan of hazelnut, or Frangelico, whereas Zoë adores the stuff, so between us you’d think one of us could pick them out. So we asked the wait staff, and they took it to the kitchen to check and came back and said yes, it definitely was the hazelnut version. Which I have to say made me feel pretty thick, but I tried more and I still thought, being charitable, that it was very light on the hazelnut.

My dessert wasn’t what I was expecting either. I knew a vegan chocolate mousse would be different, and I was expecting it to be darker, but what I wasn’t expecting was that it was completely lacking in aeration, the texture, bubble free, more like a cremeux than a mousse. I didn’t mind it, but the cognitive dissonance cancelled out some of the delight. The almond praline was more like a crunchy crumb and the marmalade on top had a lot of heavy lifting to do to offset that slick sweetness. Like a lot of what we’d eaten, it wasn’t quite there.

Never mind. It was lovely to be in Bristol, the sun was shining, the space felt like a celebration of everything that’s good about lunching on a Saturday and there was an excellent pub less than five minutes away. So we decided that, on balance, Little Hollows wasn’t half bad and we asked for the bill. There was one last twist in the tale when our server brought it.
“We’ve taken the tiramisu off the bill” he said. “It is the hazelnut tiramisu, but it turns out that it was missing the praline so it just had the Frangelico in it.” I didn’t really know what to make of that – I couldn’t see why they wouldn’t tell the truth but it was weird to dish something up which didn’t match the description on the menu and then, when we asked about the discrepancy, to say that it was our mistake. All very strange, but generous of them – it was after all a great tiramisu at full price, let alone gratis. Our bill, including gratuity, came to just shy of a hundred and fifty pounds.
There are always mixed feelings when I cross a restaurant off my list, especially when it’s a Bristol one. And I definitely have that with Little Hollows. I liked so much of what they did, and their basic concept is a brilliant one, so I’m disappointed not love my meal as much as I hoped. I’m sad, too, that I can’t bring my Reading readers another must-visit Bristol restaurant (so many of the highest ratings I’ve given out are to Bristolian establishments) or convince any Bristol readers out there that I am anywhere near the zeitgeist.
But in truth there’s also a degree of relief that the choice of where to eat in Bristol, for me at least, has got easier rather than more difficult. If I lived in Bristol I can imagine I would go back, but as an occasional visitor every restaurant like COR or Marmo that I leave itching to return makes it just that little bit harder to try somewhere new, to add to my stock of Bristol reviews. And again, it’s worth making the point that this shows the gulf between places like Bristol that attract the very best and my beloved Reading, that is still fighting the good fight to bring the right kind of restaurants to town.
In Reading, Little Hollows would be a must visit. In Bristol, it’s merely a rather good restaurant in a city awash with knockouts. I hope the people who live in Bristol, and the ones who eat at Little Hollows, know how very lucky they are. In the meantime, if you live in Reading, you want an amazing puttanesca and don’t mind a short train ride, I have two words for you: Mio Fiore. Or if you love pasta go to London and visit Bancone. It’s much imitated but few restaurants, including Little Hollows, have quite matched it yet.
Little Hollows Pasta – 7.6
26 Chandos Road, Redland, Bristol, BS6 6PF
0117 9731254































